A crucial competitive advantage in bringing
talented individuals into the organisation can be exploited by successfully
avoiding some common pitfalls in the recruiting process. The leveraged advantage can be quite
significant - bad hiring decisions can cost competitors organisations a lot of
money. A mistake made in the recruitment
and selection process leading to employee turnover can cost half to
two-thirds of an employee’s annual salary. With costs
that high, can any organisation afford to make mistakes in recruitment? No
business wants to hire the wrong person for the job. We hope these five tips
may aid in your candidate selection.
1. Too much about the money, too little
about the brand value
It’s easy to assume that a great
salary package alone will attract top candidates. Often however, it is not all about
the money. Research
shows that a job seekers’ perception of a company’s reputation affects how much
they want to join the company. If the company is held in high regard,
candidates are less likely to make a decision based on remuneration alone. To
achieve a positive brand image among potential candidates, HR managers can add
significant value by identifying what is valuable for their target candidates and
advertise accordingly. For example: fresh graduates will want to develop their
skills and expand their network, therefore graduate job advertisements could
emphasise mentoring programs, networking events, and on-the-job training. Senior
roles however might emphasise coaching and development opportunities, flexible
work arrangements, engagements and involvement in innovation.
2. Relevant department input into the
role.
Most candidates value contact with or
attention from the functional head of the area in which the role sits – so their
early involvement can be crucial. Writing job advertisements is usually the
recruiter or HR partner’s job, but the relevant department manager can ensure
clarity and accuracy around the duties, skills and key competencies. This will
prevent miscommunication, especially for highly specialised roles. It can be
frustrating for candidates when recruiters aren’t specific enough about the
role. Set clear expectations about the position, and utilise the experience of
your organisation to present a clear and attractive value proposition. Candidates
value a real world presentation of the job and role.
3. Too much reliance on resumes and
interviews, too little on psychometrics
The resume and interview process is a
mainstay of recruitment and a useful tool to aid in shortlisting candidates. However
there is a significant body of evidence
that the predictive validity of unstructured interviews is about the same as
tossing a coin. One reason for this is difficult to admit, but the resume and
interview can unconsciously bias recruiters about candidates based on race,
gender, age, social context, and more. In a perfect world, interviewers would
evaluate people objectively; however judging people naturally becomes
subjective.
Research has shown
that candidates who are different from an otherwise similar group of finalists
have a very little chance of being hired, even if they’re the most qualified
candidate. Further, candidates who are similar to the hiring manager are also prioritised
as we naturally gravitate towards people who are similar to ourselves.
To minimise the risk of bias, psychometric
tests can ensure candidates are objectively
assessed as much as possible. This can offer a clearer rationale why one
candidate is a better fit for your organisation. A psychometric scale examining
resilience is much more likely to differentiate people than an open-ended
question during an interview process. Furthermore, you are provided with an
objective, comparative metric to probe particular competencies in an interview
context. The use psychometric assessment in a recruitment and selection process
avoids placing the organisation in an uneasy legal position because of
unconscious biases, or having to admit that the composition of the staff in
general or leadership team in particular differs widely from the general
population in terms of gender or ethnicity.
4. A focus on streamlining
In talent starved markets, failing to make
an offer to a candidate in a timely manner will risk losing them to your
competition. The best organisations have streamlined their recruitment
processes to minimise the risk of losing the best candidates for the role.
Organisations need to develop a clear idea of what they need and want, and how
they will evaluate this, so that the decision-making is as efficient as
possible.
A major achievement in this context is
that companies have begun to use online demographic, biographical and
psychometric measures in the screening process rather than psychometrics in a
post-interview context. Organisational financial and people metrics can be
positively impacted through: time to hire, cost of hire, and turnover metrics.
Every minute counts, deliver objective
and quantitative data before interviews commence, schedule multiple interviews
in a single day, prepare any additional testing ahead of time, and automate
your recruitment system to maximise the speed of the
recruitment process. If your organisation doesn’t have the capacity to quickly
review candidates, you can always outsource recruitment to ensure a speedy
hire. Once you have made a decision on a candidate, don’t delay. A lot can
happen between 4pm Wednesday and Thursday morning, as your role will almost
never be the only role a candidate is interested in pursuing.
5. Feedback and candidate care
Recruitment can be extremely
time-consuming, but any strong recruitment strategy emphasises candidate care.
Updating applicants and providing feedback at each stage of their application can
emphasise the recruitment’s fairness. Perception of a fair and efficient recruitment
process can generate a positive perception of the company, even for
unsuccessful applicants. Feedback can range from letting candidates know that
they have been unsuccessful with a short ‘thank you for your time and
interest’, to providing a brief explanation on competencies that can be further
improved.
Factual and objective feedback that
outlines why a candidate isn’t the right fit for the role is far more likely to
leave prospects walking away from your organisation with no hard feelings, as
opposed to jarring personal statements of inadequacy seemingly based on
personal opinion. Appropriate candidate care increases your good press, and
increases the likelihood of access to additional prospects.
In summary, the costs of a bad hire have
serious financial implications, but also impact workplace culture, performance,
and productivity. Maximise your chances of a positive return on investment by
developing robust recruitment strategies, and avoid the missteps of competitors
to lower unnecessary turnover from and provide significant value add to your
organisation.
In many organisations resilience is a vital
predictor of turnover. The
Business Personality Reflections® (BPR) is a
personality questionnaire that measures business-related competencies to assist
in selection and personal development decisions. Developed by Psych Press, this
assessment contains 70 personality scales that can be tailored to any
organisation’s needs. Below is more information about the Resilience Scale in
the Business Personality Reflections®.
Resilience
Resilience is described as the ability of an
individual to adapt to changes in their environment and bounce back from
stressful experiences. It indicates the degree to which an individual can
maintain a stable and motivated working mindset in the face of difficult
situations. Resilience is vital for success in today’s rapidly changing and
expanding work environment because it allows for the individual to maintain
their working standards regardless of the challenges they face. Without it,
inevitable changes in working conditions will negatively impact personal and
performance outcomes for employees.
A sample item for the resiliency factor
that you may see on the BPR or other questionnaires could be: “I struggle to find positives when bad things
happen.”
Studies have shown that high levels of
resilience are negatively related to a number of psychological outcomes such as
burnout (Mak et al., 2011), secondary traumatic stress (Mealer et al., 2012),
depression (McGarry et al., 2013) and anxiety (Lu et al., 2014). For example,
in separate studies Mealer et al. (2012) and McGarry et al. (2013) both found
that high resilience was associated with lower levels of anxiety, depression
and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder. These studies also found that
high resilience was associated with lower levels of burnout, which is described
as emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation and reduced personal accomplishment
in the work environment. Furthermore, resilience has been positively related to
work engagement (Mache et al., 2014) and job performance (Er-Xiu & Shu-wen,
2010).
Individuals who score highly on the Business
Personality Reflections® Resilience Scale are more likely to work
in a purposeful and determined manner to reach goals even in the presence of
potential complications preventing their progress.
You might consider using a resilience
scale in your recruiting and development processes if employees often deal
with:
- · Major and unexpected hiccups that require rapid response.
- · Stakeholders, staff, or clients that have strong opposing views.
- · Long term-projects that drag on and demand sustained energy and enthusiasm.
- · Crises where remaining calm and optimistic is needed.
- · Intensive periods of work involving long hours, multiple tasks, and tight deadlines.
Organisations need resilient employees that
have the capacity to handle a changing, unpredictable or disrupted
environment. We hope that the Resilience
Scale can provide useful information, amongst other relevant scales about
potential candidate performance within your work context or environment.
If you were interested in learning
more about the Resilience Scale, or the Business Personality Reflections®
Personality questionnaire please simply enquire now for a free trial.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated. Spam will be ignored. Thanks for contributing!